Week 3 Reading Notes
Data Compression- Wikapedia and Data Comprehension Basics
·
Data Compression
o
Process of reducing the size of a data file
§
2 Types- Lossy and Lossless Lossy- reduces by
identifying unnecessary information and removing it
·
Some loss of information is acceptable
o
Dropping non-essential details saves storage
space, preserving meaning rather than data
·
Used in digital cameras and DVD/Videos,
streaming audio files, and interactive applications
o
Video Compression
§
Intra-frame vs. inter-frame
·
Inter-frame uses previous or future frames in a
sequence to compress the current frame
·
Intra-frame uses only the current frame aka
image compression
§
Lossless-reduces by identifying and eliminating
statistical redundancy
·
Compressing highly repetitive text efficiently
without losing any information
§
Lossless=identical to the original, Lossy=no
guarantee of being identical
§
In both, Information redundancy is reduced using
methods such as coding, pattern recognition, and linear prediction
o
Compression helps reduce data storage space or
transmission
§
However, it must eventually be decompressed to
use and that can be expensive
Imaging Pittsburgh: Creating a shared gateway to digital
image collections of the Pittsburgh region
Edward Galloway outlines a collaborative project between the
University of Pittsburgh’s Digital Research Library, the Carnegie Museum of
Art, and the Western Pennsylvania Historical Society. The goal of this project
was to digitize images from physical collections that these institutions held
depicting the people, places, and events in the Pittsburgh region during its
heyday and subsequent transformation. A single web gateway was created allowing
users to search all three collections simultaneously. As with any collaborative
project, institutional differences in policies and practices created problems.
Each institution is going to view their collections from a different vantage
point, and this in turn affects how they educate their patrons and how they
catalog in regard to subject terms. In order for users to utilize and search
the web gallery efficiently, all three institutions had to agree on metadata
that was interoperable. Many decisions and compromises had to be made by all
three institutions to produce a product that was informative and user friendly.
The ultimate outcome of this project was for users to
experience the collections in ways not possible in their analog format. I
personally think that this was an attainable, and successful outcome. These
collections are Pittsburgh’s history and they should be available for access. I
saw the Teenie Harris exhibit when it was at the Carnegie Museum and I
absolutely loved it. It was so rich in culture and history, showcasing a Hill
District that has since changed drastically. I was lucky enough to have had the
chance to view the photographs in their original form, but many were not. If
nothing else, digitizing these collections allows users the opportunities to
view priceless historical images that might otherwise have been missed. I
imagine that this project was a ton of work (imagine every minuscule detail
that went into the process of digitizing these collections), however I think that
the end result was well worth it.
YouTube and Libraries
I think it’s a great idea to incorporate YouTube videos into
library instruction, and I think many libraries are probably doing this
already. It’s one thing to read directions, but for a new user it’s often
easier to see a demonstration first-hand (think of all the demonstrations we
had during orientation week). This would be especially beneficial to
distance-learners who do not have direct access to the library or the
librarians. I also think videos could be used into other capacities in the
library besides for instruction. At a public library for example, YouTube
videos could be utilized to promote a current best-selling book or a “librarian’s
favorite” book. Videos have the potential to engage patrons further into the
library and it’s services.
No comments:
Post a Comment